NAD+
Also known as: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, NAD
Overview
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, commonly referred to as NAD+, is a crucial coenzyme found in all living cells. It plays a fundamental role in numerous biological processes, acting as a key player in cellular metabolism and energy production. Specifically, NAD+ is involved in redox reactions, carrying electrons from one molecule to another, which is essential for processes like glycolysis, the citric acid cycle (Krebs cycle), and oxidative phosphorylation. These processes are critical for converting nutrients into cellular energy in the form of ATP (adenosine triphosphate). Beyond energy production, NAD+ also functions as a signaling molecule, participating in processes such as DNA repair, gene expression, and cellular aging.
The mechanism of action for NAD+ revolves around its ability to accept and donate electrons. In its oxidized form (NAD+), it can accept electrons and become reduced to NADH. This cycle of oxidation and reduction is central to its role in metabolic pathways. Furthermore, NAD+ serves as a substrate for enzymes like sirtuins and PARPs (poly ADP-ribose polymerases), which are involved in DNA repair and cellular longevity. Sirtuins, for example, are NAD+-dependent deacetylases that regulate gene expression and stress resistance. As NAD+ levels decline with age, the activity of these enzymes may also decrease, potentially contributing to age-related decline.
The current research landscape surrounding NAD+ is extensive, with over 84,000 research papers published on the topic. Research is exploring its potential role in various health conditions, particularly those associated with aging and metabolic dysfunction. While many studies are preclinical, involving cell cultures or animal models, a growing number of clinical trials are investigating the effects of NAD+ precursors, such as nicotinamide riboside (NR) and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), in humans. For example, while the provided key clinical trials do not directly investigate NAD+ supplementation, they highlight the breadth of research being conducted across various medical fields. These trials, sponsored by entities like AbbVie and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, focus on conditions ranging from Crohn's disease to menstrual cycle maintenance, demonstrating the diverse applications of clinical research methodologies. Key research papers include a review in Neuromolecular Medicine highlighting SIRT1 activators as potential geroprotective agents in brain aging, and a paper in Aging Cell exploring NAD preservation for delaying cellular senescence and initiating musculoskeletal regeneration. These papers, along with others focusing on topics from cancer to plant genetics, illustrate the multifaceted nature of NAD+ research.
Regarding safety, the available data suggests that NAD+ precursors are generally well-tolerated in humans, although more long-term studies are needed. An analysis of FDA adverse event data reveals 30 total reports associated with NAD+, none of which were classified as serious. The most commonly reported reactions include fatigue, headache, insomnia, nausea, and anxiety. This data, while limited, provides some reassurance regarding the short-term safety profile of NAD+.
Currently, NAD+ and its precursors are unregulated, meaning they are available for purchase as dietary supplements without FDA approval. They are not classified as Category 2 substances, meaning they are not banned from compounding. This unregulated status places the onus on consumers to conduct thorough research and choose reputable suppliers.
Individuals interested in longevity, anti-aging, and cognitive enhancement are the most typical users of NAD+ precursors. They may seek to boost NAD+ levels in an attempt to improve energy levels, cognitive function, and overall healthspan. However, it's crucial to note that the long-term effects of NAD+ supplementation are still under investigation, and more robust clinical trials are needed to fully understand its benefits and risks. The trust score of 77.5/100 (grade B+) reflects the promising research landscape balanced against the limitations of current safety data and regulatory oversight.
The future of NAD+ research hinges on well-designed clinical trials that can definitively establish its efficacy and safety for various health applications, which may influence future regulatory decisions.
Evidence Breakdown
28 studies analyzedResearch Timeline
Research spans 2026β2026
Score Profile
222 Clinical Trials
- Left and right myocardial ventricular energetics during cardioplegic ischemic arrest and reperfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Published COMPLETED J Mol Cell Cardiol
- Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in surgically resectable desmoplastic melanoma: cohort A of the phase 2 SWOG S1512 trial. Published COMPLETED Nat Cancer
- The differential impact of three different NAD(+) boosters on circulatory NAD and microbial metabolism in humans. Published COMPLETED Nat Metab
- Evaluation of Nicotinamide Riboside in Prevention of Small Nerve Fiber Axon Degeneration and Promotion of Nerve Regeneration. Published COMPLETED J Peripher Nerv Syst
- Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Combined With Node-Sparing Radiotherapy for Clinical T3N+ Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Single-Arm, Phase II Study (CINSREC Trial). Published COMPLETED Thorac Cancer
Showing 5 of 222 trials.
20 Research Papers
- SIRT1 Activators as Geroprotective Agents in Brain Aging: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential. Neuromolecular Med Review 135 citations
- Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations as potential tumour agnostic targets. EJC Suppl unknown 84 citations
- Double-Pronged NAD Preservation: Delaying Cellular Senescence and Initiating Musculoskeletal Regeneration. Aging Cell unknown 72 citations
- Complete Chloroplast Genome of the Eria Sensu Lato Complex (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis and Phylogenetic Relationship. Ecol Evol unknown 62 citations
- Resveratrol supplementation mitigates age-related declines in egg production, quality, and ovarian health of laying hens. Anim Nutr unknown 61 citations
Showing 5 of 20 papers by citation count.
FDA Data
Not FDA-Approved
NAD+ has not been evaluated by the FDA for safety or efficacy. It is not approved for human therapeutic use in the United States.
Use Cases
Clinics Offering NAD+
All clinics →Peptide therapy clinics in the CheckPeptides US directory that reference NAD+ or overlap with its common use cases. Sorted by Google review volume and rating.
- Aesthetic Solutions NY: Medical Spa Queens, Botox, IV Hydration, NAD+, Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, MounjaroNew York, NY mentions NAD+4.9β223 reviews
- 4.9β100 reviews
- Endure Health and Wellness: Weight Loss, Testosterone, ED, PE, Vitamin Shot, NAD+New York, NY mentions NAD+5.0β12 reviews
- NAD IV Therapy NYCNew York, NY mentions NAD+5.0β8 reviews
- 0 reviews
- Next Health in West HollywoodLos Angeles, CA matching use-case5.0β2,219 reviews
- Soak & Sage - A Social Wellness SpaSeattle, WA matching use-case4.9β1,951 reviews
- TRT NationTampa, FL matching use-case4.9β1,887 reviews
Frequently Asked Questions
How does NAD+ work at a cellular level to potentially provide anti-aging benefits?
What are the reported side effects of NAD+ supplementation, and how serious are they?
Since NAD+ is not FDA-approved, what regulations govern its sale and use?
What are some alternative approaches to boosting NAD+ levels, and how do they compare to direct NAD+ supplementation?
Given the ongoing research, what are the key considerations when evaluating the quality and reliability of NAD+ studies?
Related Peptides
Oxytocin
Hypothalamic neuropeptide
Tesamorelin
GHRH analogue
Glutathione
Antioxidant tripeptide
Humanin
Mitochondria-derived peptide
Selank
Anxiolytic nootropic peptide
Ipamorelin
Ghrelin mimetic / GHS
Quick Facts
- Classification
- Coenzyme / metabolic cofactor
- Molecular Weight
- 663.4 Da
- PubChem
- CID 5892 ↗
- Regulatory Status
- N/A
Score Breakdown
- Evidence Quality (30%)
- 0
- Safety Profile (25%)
- 65
- Study Design (20%)
- 13
- Research Depth (15%)
- 70
- Research Recency (10%)
- 100
Evidence Summary
- Clinical Trials
- 222
- Research Papers
- 20
- Trust Score
- 39.4/100
- Grade
- D-